At Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:15:08 -0400, Alexey A. Illarionov wrote: > I just want to emphasize that the Grigory's patch does not solve the > problem it only extends a little bit range of possible j and m where > algorithm gives reasonable answer. For example, > (200 200 200) > (-10 60 -50) = 2.55804e+18 +- 1.35857e+17 > while the correct answer would be approximately > 7.4939e-4
Thanks, I understand. Any patches for the large/asymptotic cases appreciated. _______________________________________________ Bug-gsl mailing list [email protected] https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gsl
