Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > set-procedure-property! doesn't do proper type check on first arg
>
> Incidentally, I'm in favour of unifying object and procedure
> properties.
I'm in favor of dropping properties altogether. (But maybe we can
continue that discussion on the guile list.)
[...]
> Looking closer into procprops.c, I would say that unifying procedure
> and object properties would be an improvement anyway, because we could
> remove that scm_stand_in_scm_proc ickyness.
Here I really would like to say that I did *not* implement that thing! :)
BTW, primitive procedures now *have* a procedure slot.
scm_stand_in_scm_proc can be removed any day regardless of
unification.
> ObBUG: set-procedure-properties! does the same wrong thing. Are you
> going to fix it, Mikael?
I suggest that the one who fix it first fix it. (I'm not working on it
right now, though.)
Best,
/mdj
