Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If I add this at line 567 in backtrace.c (just after the scm_make_print_state):
>
> scm_protect_object(print_state);
>
> the program works fine, but of course that isn't the "right thing".
it's quite close, actually.
I'll check in a fix shortly.
thanks for the _wonderful_ report,
--mike
--
Perhaps it IS a good day to die; I say we ship it!
-- Klingon Programmer
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
