Martin Grabmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> guile> (/)
> <unnamed port>:2:1: In procedure / in expression (/):
> <unnamed port>:2:1: Wrong type argument in position 1: #<undefined>
> ABORT: (wrong-type-arg)
>
> I am not sure how to fix this, because of the generic function
> dispatch stuff. Should there be a dispatch for a wrong number of
> arguments too, or just a call to SCM_WRONG_NUM_ARGS?
I fixed this by making SCM_WTA_DISPATCH_0 signal a `wrong num args'
error when the generic function hasn't been initialized yet. I think
this is the right thing to do.
What I'm not sure about is: should we allow generic functions or
methods with zero arguments? Is that useful? You can have exactly
one method for the zero argument case.
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
