Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I think there is an "scm_mallocated leak" in association with
> object->string.
oh. thanks for the report, I'll look at this later today.
[ the whole approach of making things signed so that (if you are
lucky) you can detect overflows stinks. the checking should be done
when *changing* the counter, not in GC. ]
> [snip]
--
Look, would it save you all this bother if I just gave up and went mad now?
-- Arthur Dent
_______________________________________________
Bug-guile mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
