Bill Schottstaedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I guess this is not news, but just in case... Some Guile numerical > primitives that should (could?) accept inexact integers (at least > that's the way I read r5rs) do not. The remainder example below is > taken from r5rs:
I'll add these to the list as I look back over numbers.c -- I've been integrating GMP support, starting with our bignums, and I've already fixed some similar issues (maybe these as well?). I've filed your message as workbook/bugs/numbers-gmp-conversion. I'll add other bits to it as appropriate. Thanks -- Rob Browning rlb @defaultvalue.org, @linuxdevel.com, and @debian.org Previously @cs.utexas.edu GPG=1C58 8B2C FB5E 3F64 EA5C 64AE 78FE E5FE F0CB A0AD _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
