Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Marius> Since this reduction is so small, I'm inclined not to > Marius> apply your patch. What do others say? > > Do the warnings indicate real problems, or are they false positives? > If real, we should fix them; if false, we shouldn't, because the fix > will generally impact performance, and instead we should send a report > to valgrind.
The way I understand it, they are false positives. The warnings come when Guile is conservatively marking pointers in a region that hasn't been fully initialized. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
