Stephen Compall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I don't know about that, but the named let section and do section were > suddenly much clearer after I converted them.
Those bits aren't too terrible but could probably stand a bit of polish. Something in point form might clarify what happens in `do'. > I assume you want me to repropose the remainder of the changes on > guile-devel, as suggested earlier? Typos can go in immediately, the rest will need copyright paperwork. Yes, guile-devel is the best place to get feedback. Make sure your diffs are against the current cvs, for easy of applying. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
