Hi,
there are a couple of variable C99-style variable definitions in CVS HEAD. Debian Woody and OpenBSD/i386 3.5 are both shipped with GCC 2.95. IMHO it's too early to use C99isms.
Index: arbiters.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/arbiters.c,v
retrieving revision 1.35
diff -u -r1.35 arbiters.c
--- arbiters.c 17 Aug 2004 23:13:06 -0000 1.35
+++ arbiters.c 20 Aug 2004 16:43:25 -0000
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@
"@code{#f}.")
#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_try_arbiter
{
- SCM_VALIDATE_SMOB (1, arb, arbiter);
scm_t_bits old;
+ SCM_VALIDATE_SMOB (1, arb, arbiter);
FETCH_STORE (old, * (scm_t_bits *) SCM_CELL_OBJECT_LOC(arb,0), SCM_LOCK_VAL);
return scm_from_bool (old == SCM_UNLOCK_VAL);
}
@@ -142,8 +142,8 @@
"release it.")
#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_release_arbiter
{
- SCM_VALIDATE_SMOB (1, arb, arbiter);
scm_t_bits old;
+ SCM_VALIDATE_SMOB (1, arb, arbiter);
FETCH_STORE (old, *(scm_t_bits*)SCM_CELL_OBJECT_LOC(arb,0), SCM_UNLOCK_VAL);
return scm_from_bool (old == SCM_LOCK_VAL);
}
Index: strings.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/strings.c,v
retrieving revision 1.86
diff -u -r1.86 strings.c
--- strings.c 19 Aug 2004 16:48:54 -0000 1.86
+++ strings.c 20 Aug 2004 16:43:25 -0000
@@ -717,9 +717,11 @@
res = scm_i_make_string (i, &data);
for (l = args; !SCM_NULLP (l); l = SCM_CDR (l))
{
+ size_t len;
+
s = SCM_CAR (l);
SCM_VALIDATE_STRING (SCM_ARGn, s);
- size_t len = scm_i_string_length (s);
+ len = scm_i_string_length (s);
memcpy (data, scm_i_string_chars (s), len);
data += len;
scm_remember_upto_here_1 (s);
Index: threads.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/guile/guile/guile-core/libguile/threads.c,v
retrieving revision 1.65
diff -u -r1.65 threads.c
--- threads.c 19 Aug 2004 17:16:01 -0000 1.65
+++ threads.c 20 Aug 2004 16:43:25 -0000
@@ -937,6 +937,7 @@
scm_threads_mark_stacks (void)
{
volatile SCM c;
+ long stack_len;
for (c = all_threads; !SCM_NULLP (c); c = SCM_CDR (c))
{
@@ -955,10 +956,10 @@
} #if SCM_STACK_GROWS_UP
- long stack_len = t->top - t->base;
+ stack_len = t->top - t->base;
scm_mark_locations (t->base, stack_len);
#else
- long stack_len = t->base - t->top;
+ stack_len = t->base - t->top;
scm_mark_locations (t->top, stack_len);
#endif
scm_mark_locations ((SCM_STACKITEM *) t->regs,_______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
