Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > list-index is defined in boot-9.scm, but its signature does not > correspond to the srfi-1 function. I consider this a bug.
As long as you get the right thing after use-modules srfi-1 then I don't think it's a bug. There's a few others where the core is extended by srfi-1, like member or delete. And iota is another like list-index where the core version is undocumented. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
