Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > And one more problem ... the same problem exists in CVS head, but a > similar patch doesn't fix it ... still investigating.
I'm looking into this as well, now. The fix you did for 1.6 looks good, although I don't understand it completely yet. I will try to come up with my own patch to CVS head. One larger change I have in mind is to move the offset calculation into the continuation code itself, which is where it belongs. Each continuation will get a new "offset" field and the stack code will just use it. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
