Hi, "Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2006/12/5, SZAVAI Gyula <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Kevin Ryde wrote: >> > "Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> > >> >> (Not entirely sure that the common zero is a good idea, but I tend >> >> to think so.) >> >> >> > >> > I suppose it's a question of whether "*" should do that, or leave it >> > up to the application. >> > >> >> I think there are 3 solution: >> 1, make * really generic (non-associative, no 0, no 1) > > In Guile, this might be tricky to do without large damage to performance. It would be soooo nice if some day we could have a framework to specialize invocations, especially for arithmetic operators (e.g., like what CMUCL and others have)... :-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list Bug-guile@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
