"Simon Butcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > numbers.c: In function 'xisinf': > numbers.c:147: warning: implicit declaration of function 'isinf'
I think we went 12 rounds with that recently. I think it was slackness in the configure test, letting gcc do constant folding instead of actually probing for the func. You should be able to edit the generated config.h to turn off HAVE_ISINF. > numbers.c: In function 'scm_log': > numbers.c:6022: error: '_Complex_I' undeclared (first use in this > function) That may be new. The test for using "complex double" is whether that type exists. I'd have thought <complex.h> (which your config.h says exists) supplied _Complex_I. Is there another name or something? _______________________________________________ Bug-guile mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guile
