On Wed 16 Jun 2010 01:12, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Andy Wingo <[email protected]> writes: > >> In our case, my opinion is that we should change the rule to be, "the >> first compatible version found in the path"; though perhaps we should >> wait for confirmation from Ludovic. > > I’m a bit lost. As you said on IRC, we should probably start by looking > at what other implementations do (for those implementations that resolve > modules at run-time, that is.)
Well I am a little lost too. Currently I would be fine with not encoding version information into the path at all; the only way to support multiple installed versions would be %load-path trickery. So instead of rnrs/6/base.scm, just rnrs/base.scm (though the module still stores its version). Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
