Hi, On Sun 20 Jun 2010 16:23, Ludovic Courtès <invalid.nore...@gnu.org> writes:
>> So, you want Guile to fail faster for this error; how do you distinguish >> it from eval-when errors as above? Or would you prefer that eval-when >> errors lead to failures as well? > > Do you mean that, for programs written to be interpreted, which lack proper > ‘eval-when’ clauses, the idea was to fall back to interpretation when > auto-compilation fails? That would indeed be friendlier to programs written > for previous versions of Guile. Yes, that was the goal. > However, in the example I gave, somehow, an error should occur. With 1.8 you > would get an error when reading ‘foo.scm’, whereas here it’s just > silently ignored, which sounds wrong. Indeed. Andy -- http://wingolog.org/
