Hi Alexei,
Alexei Matveev <alexei.matv...@gmail.com> skribis:
>>> How about this:
>>>
>>> Return @code{#t} iff @var{items} is a list or vector such that, for
>>> each element @var{x} and the next element @var{y} of @var{items},
>>> @code{(@var{less} @var{x} @var{y})} returns @code{#f}.
>>>
>>> This avoids use of ‘m’, which would need to be defined, and makes
>>> it clear what “comparing element i to the preceeding element”
>>> means.
>
> Yes, "m" should not be mentioned. But I think you got it backwards again:
>
> Return @code{#t} iff @var{items} is a list or vector such that, for
> each element @var{x} and the next element @var{y} of @var{items},
> @code{(@var{less} @var{y} @var{x})} returns @code{#f}.
>
> Note the order of x and y in (less? y x) in the last line.
Oops, indeed.
Pushed in commit fd07759b7d4c9d631090b04855ab81b6a2109e9e.
Thanks for the report, patch, and review!
Ludo’.
