On 9 March 2013 16:21, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > On Sat 09 Mar 2013 02:41, Daniel Hartwig <mand...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Interpretting ‘+0000’ timezone is sensible in a robust implementation, > > Yes, I agree, this makes sense. > >> though what to do if a numeric timezone is given other than this? > > I would continue to raise an error I think. Timezones get complicated, > fast, and there is little hope that we could preserve correctness. > WDYT?
Ok. What about Ludo's original comment, about the extra space in the sqlite header?
