David Kastrup <d...@gnu.org> writes: > So you think that it will be more "lightweight" if (values) does not > have an immediate representation but rather creates a multiple-values > object on the heap?
I don't have time to continue this discussion, but I wanted to respond
to this one point: there should be a single global statically-allocated
instance of the multiple-values object containing zero values, and the
procedures that create multiple-values objects would always use that
one.
Mark
