Well, since the obvious fallback of using SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC is barred since _all_ of SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_0_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_1_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_2_LOC, SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_3_LOC are broken, will there be something like an official guarantee that using the undocumented SCM_SMOB_OBJECT_N_LOC will be supported for several years? Or is one supposed to use the undocumented SCM_CELL_OBJECT_LOC instead?
I don't see any _documented_ accessor to SMOB cell locations that would not be broken in the current source. This is sort of important. -- David Kastrup
