On 2020-12-12 4:26 p.m., John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote: > I assume the crash has got something to do how values are packed and unpacked > into the SCM object type. I have not been able to find the problem yet myself, > unfortunately which is why I am reporting this issue here. I see this in scm.h:
/* The 0?: constructions makes sure that the code is never executed, and that there is no performance hit. However, the alternative is compiled, and does generate a warning when used with the wrong pointer type. We use a volatile pointer type to avoid warnings from clang. The Tru64 and ia64-hp-hpux11.23 compilers fail on `case (0?0=0:x)' statements, so for them type-checking is disabled. */ # if defined __DECC || defined __HP_cc # define SCM_UNPACK(x) ((scm_t_bits) (x)) # else # define SCM_UNPACK(x) ((scm_t_bits) (0? (*(volatile SCM *)0=(x)): x)) # endif Regards, Dave -- John David Anglin dave.ang...@bell.net
