Hello! l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) skribis:
> However, I’ve come to think that we don’t necessarily need a separate > name for the distro, but we do need a name for the module name space. > > The obvious solution would be (gnu ...). There’d be modules like > (gnu packages openssl), which does not mean that OpenSSL is a GNU > package, but I think that should be clear in this context. Anyway, > that’s the option that I like the most currently. It seems we went on discussing a distro name, but that turned out not to solve the module name space issue. :-) So I’ll rename the (distro ...) modules to (gnu ...), because that’s nicer and more meaningful (“a distro of the GNU system”). Thanks! Ludo’.
