Am Samstag, 23. Februar 2013 schrieb Ludovic Courtès: > > (make-regexp > > "^[[:blank:]]*([[:graph:]]+)[[:blank:]]*([[:graph:]]*)(.*)$"))) > > I think it should be a + after the second [[:blank:]], because there > should be space between the interpreter name and its argument.
Sometimes, there is no space at all: In #!/usr/bin/perl for instance, when there is no argument. Then the "+" version would fail. With "*", it works as expected. > What about more descriptive names like ‘interp’, ‘arg1’, and ‘rest’? Maybe. I did not choose descriptive names because the real interpreter is sometimes the first, sometimes the second piece. But your suggestion looks good. > Rather (has-env? (string-suffix? "/env" interp)). Ok, thanks. > > + (if has-env > > + (begin > Please align with the ‘h’ here... > > + (patch p bin > > + (string-append " " second > > third))))) > ... and with the ‘p’ here. Ok. The annoying thing with this way of indenting is that lines become very long very quickly; I like keeping them at less than 80 characters. Andreas
