Konrad Hinsen <[email protected]> skribis: > > What would you like to package? (It would be great to discuss that to > > avoid duplication.) > > Stuff I use myself, meaning software at the intersection of "Python" > and "scientific computing". Unless someone is already working on it, > I'd choose NumPy as my first target. Python 3 would be another missing > piece I'd like to tackle.
AFAIK nobody is working on these–otherwise speak out! ;-) > > Check this message [2] as well. It would be great to stick to the plan, > > but it's not mandatory. > > That plan sounds reasonable, but I have no competence with that kind > of software. I'd rather start with packages that I know very well, to > the point of having contributed to their development. Yes, that makes sense. Part of the plan for 0.3 is just “more packages”, broadly. > Right now, my goal is "learn Guix", with package definitions produced > as a side effect. That's how side effects sneak into purely functional > package management ;-) Aah! :-) Ludo’.
