Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis: > [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >>> >>>> It turns out Hop & Bigloo have to be upgraded in lockstep. I believe >>>> a new Hop version is around the corner, so I’m tempted to just wait >>>> for that. >>>> >>>> WDYT? >>> >>> I think we should find a solution that doesn't lead to the 'hop' build >>> being broken every time 'bigloo' is upgraded before 'hop'. >>> >>> An obvious solution would be to keep two versions of 'bigloo': the >>> latest release, and the release that corresponds to the latest release >>> of 'hop'. Hopefully these would be the same most of the time. >> >> Yes, that sounds like a plan. And hopefully the “old” Bigloo would just >> differ by its ‘version’ and ‘source’ fields, which is easily handled. >> >> Would you like to propose a patch? > > I don't actually use 'bigloo' or 'hop' myself, and right now I have my > hands full with a lot of pending work for Guile, so I'd prefer to let > someone else take care of this.
Message received. ;-) I used by super powers to fix it in ffc1074. Thanks! Ludo’.
