[email protected] (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") skribis:
> While looking into another issue, I happened to notice dangling .so
> references in some executables in Guix packages. This is the first in a
> series of bug reports for each such package. Some might be false
> positives; Mark suggested I report them all so we have a list to go
> through. It's also not comprehensive because of course I don't have
> every Guix package installed; the script to go through one's /gnu/store
> to get output such as the following for each package is attached at the
> bottom of this mail.
Nice, thanks the reports (although it’s a bit daunting ;-)).
I think there are two things to do:
1. Identify the reasons why these things aren’t in the RUNPATH:
missing -L? ld-wrapper bug (introduced in last ‘core-updates’?)?
2. Add a standard phase in gnu-build-system.scm, based on (guix elf),
that checks whether things in DT_NEEDED can actually be found among
the directories in DT_RUNPATH, and errors out if not.
Thanks,
Ludo’.
