On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer <[email protected]> wrote: > [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> 2. Upon rollback from P to N, keep all the generations, but use P+1 >> for the next generation number. Doesn’t work, because rolling back >> from P+1 would bring you back to P instead of N. > > Perhaps we can eventually move to an actual tree structure where the > nodes can be named whatever.
+1 - Dave
