Leo Famulari <[email protected]> skribis: > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 12:24:45PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> > Leo Famulari <[email protected]> skribis: >> > >> > > From bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> > > Message-Id: >> > > <bf1f2a1c3621ba93ec99711ec78a79663acb6e82.1456734966.git....@famulari.name> >> > > From: Leo Famulari <[email protected]> >> > > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 >> > > Subject: [PATCH 1/1] gnu: ilmbase: Add patches to fix build on i686. >> > > >> > > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>. >> > > >> > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBox.patch, >> > > gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-testBoxAlgo.patch: New files. >> > > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add them. >> > > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[native-inputs]: Add patch/testBox >> > > and patch/testBoxAlgo. >> > > [arguments]: Add 'patch-for-i686' phase. >> > >> > Cool! >> > >> > I think it’d be reasonable to squash both patches in one file, and to >> > apply it unconditionally. WDYT? >> >> Sure, I'll send an updated patch. > > Attached. >
[...] >> > So I gather upgrading to IlmBase 2.0.1 is not an option? >> >> 2.0.1 would be a downgrade for us; we are on 2.2.0. I did try it without >> success. Oops, sorry. :-) > From 2f895108a3f476038b82e03645ee7f51e4ee1675 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari <[email protected]> > Date: Mon, 29 Feb 2016 02:23:43 -0500 > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: ilmbase: Add patch to fix build on i686. > > Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/22049>. > > * gnu/packages/patches/ilmbase-fix-tests.patch: New file. > * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it. > * gnu/packages/graphics.scm (ilmbase)[source]: Add patch. Perfect, thanks again! Ludo’.
