I don't think we have what this thread talks about covered in the manual. If we do have though, consider this bug obsolete.
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00603.html > > Info > HTML > man > txt > PDF > PS ? > Roughly, yes. Not the same message, but in the thread: > What about installing only HTML? > > I find that HTML (and Info, and man) is more convenient to read on-line > than PDFs. We rarely include PDF documentation in packages. > > Of course, avoiding PDF/PS/DVI allows us to remove the dependency > on TeX Live. Last, from discussions I heard at the Reproducible > Build Summit, I think DVIs and maybe PS/PDFs are not > bit-reproducible out-of-the-box. > > WDYT? > > Maybe we should have a policy on how to choose the installed > documentation formats. > > Ludo’. -- ♥Ⓐ ng0 Current Keys: https://we.make.ritual.n0.is/ng0.txt For non-prism friendly talk find me on http://www.psyced.org
