Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]> skribis: >> Maybe we can simply patch the important packages (findutils, >> libunistring) and wait and see if others need the patch. Not ideal, but >> I can’t think of a better way. > > Ok fine for me. > > I'll send findutils and libunistring patches for now.
I see these have been committed to core-updates: commit b100e0e89ebd1a6e73d6be4e354dd684abb057a4 Author: Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]> Date: Mon Apr 17 12:18:29 2017 +0200 gnu: libunistring: Fix make check issues on multi-core machines. * gnu/packages/patches/libunistring-gnulib-multi-core.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch): Add previous patch. * gnu/packages/libunistring.scm (libunistring)[patches]: Add a reference to previous patch. Signed-off-by: Marius Bakke <[email protected]> commit da8e256a527a21ad88005c1d84514d910b964c19 Author: Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]> Date: Mon Apr 17 12:18:28 2017 +0200 gnu: findutils: Fix make check issues on multi-core machines. * gnu/packages/patches/findutils-gnulib-multi-core.patch: New file. * gnu/local.mk (dist_patch): Add previous patch. * gnu/packages/base.scm (findutils)[patches]: Add a reference to the previous patch. Signed-off-by: Marius Bakke <[email protected]> Closing this bug now. Thank you Mathieu! Ludo’.
