Hi! Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
> What do you think of the attached patches? The first makes libxfce4ui > only propagate the latest gtk+, so I added gtk+-2 where needed. The > second removes “exo” from the “xfce” meta-package, because it doesn’t > seem needed. “exo” propagates “gtk+-2”, so it would be hard to prevent > the conflict otherwise. > > These patches are only a temporary fix until we can find a way to mark > certain conflicts as unproblematic. These patches seem reasonable to me. Another option (perhaps slightly less intrusive) would be to implement the ‘xfce’ meta-package using ‘union-build’ instead of ‘propagated-inputs’. Thanks, Ludo’.
