Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis:
> I agree that this is quite confusing. Perhaps we should issue a warning
> if the regexp begins with "-".
>
> Also, perhaps we should *always* require an argument after "-u", even if
> "-u" is at the end of the command line, failing otherwise. Users would
> then learn to always pass an argument to "-u", and thus would be less
> likely to fall into this trap when adding more options after the "-u".
I’m in favor of the former:
diff --git a/guix/scripts/package.scm b/guix/scripts/package.scm
index 8da7a3fd3..b6133b6af 100644
--- a/guix/scripts/package.scm
+++ b/guix/scripts/package.scm
@@ -486,6 +486,11 @@ Install, remove, or upgrade packages in a single transaction.\n"))
arg-handler))))
(option '(#\u "upgrade") #f #t
(lambda (opt name arg result arg-handler)
+ (when (string-prefix? "-" arg)
+ (warning (G_ "upgrade regexp '~a' looks like a \
+command-line option~%")
+ arg)
+ (warning (G_ "is this intended?~%")))
(let arg-handler ((arg arg) (result result))
(values (alist-cons 'upgrade arg
;; Delete any prior "upgrade all"
Thoughts?
Ludo’.
