Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
> Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net> skribis:
>
>>>From 44b8f1c04713d11601d964ecfbe2fc248a15e7c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Ricardo Wurmus <rek...@elephly.net>
>> Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2017 09:24:58 +0200
>> Subject: [PATCH] doc: Encourage signature verification.
>>
>> * doc/contributing.texi (Submitting Patches): Remind contributors to verify
>> cryptographic signatures.
>> ---
>> doc/contributing.texi | 6 ++++++
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/doc/contributing.texi b/doc/contributing.texi
>> index 925c584e4..0073f2451 100644
>> --- a/doc/contributing.texi
>> +++ b/doc/contributing.texi
>> @@ -334,6 +334,12 @@ updates for a given software package in a single place
>> and have them
>> affect the whole system---something that bundled copies prevent.
>>
>> @item
>> +If the authors of the packaged software provide a cryptographic
>> +signature for the release tarball, make an effort to verify the
>> +authenticity of the archive. For a detached GPG signature file this
>> +would be done with the @code{gpg --verify} command.
>
> I would make it the very first item of the check list.
>
> If that’s fine with you, please push and maybe close the bug!
Looks like I’ve already pushed this a while back. I’ll move it up to
the top of the list. (And I’m closing this bug.)
--
Ricardo
GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net
