Hi Leo! Leo Famulari <[email protected]> skribis:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2017 at 02:59:14PM -0400, Leo Famulari wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 10:40:20PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> > Leo Famulari <[email protected]> skribis: >> > > They recommend we apply for a vendor zone instead [2]. We would not have >> > > to run our own NTP servers. >> > > >> > > Does anyone know if GNU or the FSF have a vendor zone we could use? >> > > Otherwise, we should apply for one and adjust our ntp-service. >> > >> > Apparently 1.gnu.pool.ntp.org does not exist, so I suppose we can apply >> > for one. >> > >> > I’ll email the GNU maintainer list to let them know and double-check. >> >> Based on that discussion, I've applied for guix.pool.ntp.org. > > The DNS for {0,1,2,3}.guix.pool.ntp.org is live, and the attached patch > is working for me. Great! > I think we should document that I am the administrative contact for the > "zone". Any suggestions for where to document that? At least as a comment in the definition of ‘%ntp-servers’? Maybe we should also have a file in guix-maintenance.git listing specific responsibilities like this, membership to linux-distros or similar lists, privileged contact with upstream for specific packages, etc. WDYT? > From e8fd9d703dba134dab7f008951e68d11d3d2ca21 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Leo Famulari <[email protected]> > Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2017 20:43:40 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] services: ntp: Use the NTP pool via the 'guix' zone. > > * gnu/services/networking.scm (%ntp-servers): Use *.guix.pool.ntp.org. Yes! :-) Thanks, Ludo’.
