Marius Bakke <mba...@fastmail.com> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes:
[...] >>> Now, it would be good to do a final update of glibc so we get the fix >>> for CVE-2017-15804 and a few other things. Could you upload a new >>> tarball for glibc-2.26-105-g0890d5379c.tar.xz? I'm getting >>> "0m8cnp2nik0596adwibhl0f3w649m57i3qciqwpwiix7y0sb7vhi" for it. >> >> I got the same hash but decided to not go with -9 after re-reading >> xz(1), which discourages its use due to the memory consumption the >> decompressor needs. >> >> The size difference looks reasonable (I used the default, which is -6): >> >> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> -rw-r--r-- 1 ludo users 15683872 Dec 5 18:00 >> glibc-2.26-105-g0890d5379c.tar.xz >> -rw-r--r-- 1 ludo users 15309116 Dec 5 18:00 >> glibc-2.26-105-g0890d5379c.tar.xz-9 >> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- >> >> The file should be on alpha.gnu.org now. > > Thanks! I got the same hash and pushed an update. Since this entails a > full rebuild, I also merged in Guile 2.2.3 and updated that as well. Excellent, I was going to suggest doing that. :-) Thanks! Ludo’. PS: Please don’t start an eval today as I’m preparing the release.