Ok, I started a guix lint on 0.14.0.1183-1b321. Will attach log here asap.
2018-01-14 17:53 GMT+01:00 Danny Milosavljevic <[email protected]>: > On Sun, 14 Jan 2018 17:43:27 +0100 > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Gábor Boskovits wrote on 14/01/18 at 17:13: > > > Maybe we could use guix to check for these, and some > > > other things could also be spotted. > > > WDYT? > > > > Agreed, I think. > > Yeah, +1 > > > We should be able to improve the quality of these guesses: the > > repository URI is about as likely to be foo://bar/<package>... as a > > regular tarball URI. > > > > Or we make a file-name mandatory for certain methods. > > I agree that some heuristics to figure out the file-name from > (svn-reference-url ref) would be nice. > > It's not that important that the store filenames are meaningful to humans, > it's just nice-to-have. So I'd say heuristic it and be done with it. > > On second thought, maybe even default file-name to the Guix package name > (if possible at this point in Guix). The hash value will make it unique > regardless (for example if there are multiple svn-download blocks in the > same package) >
