Chris Marusich (2018-04-09 23:38 -0700) wrote: [...] > Because I changed the package-full-name procedure, this also fixes the > package names in other places, such as graphs produced by "guix graph".
I recall there was some discussion about 'package-full-name' in the past but I remember nothing about it :-) Well, maybe it is not relevant at all, but I've found there was a proposition to use "@" in 'package-full-name' and it is still not used there. Look at: http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-04/msg01141.html -- Alex
