flags 31841 + notabug close 31841 thanks Hi Ludovic,
[email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis: > >> If there's a good reason to avoid implementing Ricardo's suggestion, I >> don't mind keeping my modified 'guix' script above, but I confess that I >> don't yet understand the cause of your reluctance. > > Well I’m not opposed to it, but my first reaction was that it adds > complexity, it’s redundant with the ‘configure’ checks, and one can > always find other ways to make things break. > > Now, I agree that it would be useful for the use case you mentioned > (build in ‘guix environment’ and run outside of it), so if you come > up with a patch, that works for me! Fair enough. >> Anyway, it seems that my practice of running 'guix' from a private git >> checkout is becoming increasingly awkward to arrange. I would be >> pleased if this mode of operation were better supported. > > I do that (like every Guix developer I suppose) every day, so I don’t > think it’s going to stop working any time soon. > > In this case, the requirement of a new dependency made the issue > apparent but fundamentally nothing has changed. In particular, > ~/.config/guix is not required any more than it was before, contrary to > what the subject says. Indeed, good points. I considered retitling this bug to "./pre-inst-env guix system fails outside of the development environment" or "now requires guile-sqlite3", but the more I think about it, the more this seems like a non-issue. > OK to close this issue? Done, thanks. Mark
