Hello Andy, Andy Wingo <[email protected]> skribis:
> On Thu 05 Jul 2018 14:27, [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Hello, >> >> Andy Wingo <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> The signal thread is a possibility though in that case you'd get a >>> warning; the signal-handling thread appears in scm_all_threads. Do you >>> see a warning? If you do, that is a problem :) >> >> I don’t see a warning. >> >> But as a Guile user, I shouldn’t see a warning just because there’s a >> signal thread anyway; it’s not a thread I spawned myself. > > I understand but it's how it works. If we want to change this, probably > we need a similar interface as we have with finalization. Right, understood. >> scheme@(guile-user)> (all-threads) >> $1 = (#<thread 140488743438080 (1b06c40)> #<thread 140488815434624 >> (1b06e00)>) >> scheme@(guile-user)> (when (zero? (primitive-fork)) (primitive-_exit 0)) >> ;; no warning > > Are you certain that this is the signal-handling thread and not the > finalizer thread? I suspect it is the finalizer thread, and that it > gets properly shut down before the fork. Oh, you must be right. > Regarding seeing the warning: do you do make some other binding for the > default warning port in Guix? No. Thanks, Ludo’.
