Leo Famulari <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2018. okt. 3., Sze, 16:54):
> On Tue, Oct 02, 2018 at 04:49:20PM -0500, Katherine Cox-Buday wrote: > > We should perhaps begin thinking about switching the Go build system to > > the 1.11 series of releases. > > I agree. When Go 1.11 was released, Go 1.9 became unsupported upstream, > so we should stop using it. > > The go-build-system as implemented in Guix worked great through Go 1.9. > > Go 1.10 changed how the Go compiler chooses whether or not to re-use > compiled Go objects, using a technique they call "content-based > staleness", which is basically a memoized cache, similar to Guix. [0] > > For us, the downside of that change is that, when building within Guix > using the tools we have now, the Go compiler never re-uses compiled > objects and instead rebuilds everything, every time. That is, the Go > build cache is never hit. It's inefficient but nothing breaks from what > I've seen. > > It would be great if our go-build-system could be updated to work with > the new Go build cache, but in my opinion it's not a blocker. I think we > will have to change it eventually, because they seem to be phasing out > $GOPATH, but we are good for now. > > What do you think? > > I think we should go for it. I don't think the cache issue is a blocker. > [0] > https://bugs.gnu.org/30579 > https://golang.org/doc/go1.10#build >
