Hi, Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> skribis:
> [email protected] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Jelle Licht <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> The current ansible package is still brokenin the same way. >>> >>> Is there already an acceptable way of working around this problem? >>> Otherwise I could send my (extremely hacky) workaround that adds a specific >>> condition in the ansible source code to check for .ansible-real. >> >> For now I think we have to go with the hack. Make sure to add a comment >> linking to this bug report. > > There is a way to get around this. It’s presented in #29951: > > https://issues.guix.info/issue/29951 > > Open issues with this include a hard-coded store prefix, but it’s no big > obstacle. Should we give this a try on core-updates? Definitely, please do! Thanks, Ludo’.
