On 2019-03-08, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]> skribis: >> I'm not sure where it would be appropriate to add more comments >> regarding the GPL/Openssl incompatibilities; e.g. if someone were to >> propose adding one of the u-boot targets that requires it, they might >> just go ahead and re-add the openssl input... > > There’s always a risk. I guess we’ll have to be careful when doing > reviews.
Sure. I was thinking maybe putting a comment in the native-inputs where "openssl" was removed, but wasn't sure what the conventions might be. > In addition, we can add a ‘lint’ checker for this case, WDYT? Does the lint checker have a way to identify a confidence level, e.g. *maybe* it has this issue vs. *certainly*? Is there a way to override the lint checker issues for known false positives? Otherwise, it might just be annoying noise for packagers where it isn't appropriate. live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
