On 5 May 2019 14:52, "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:20:39PM -0400, Raghav Gururajan wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > > > Based on the mail-list thread "https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help- > > guix/2019-05/msg00124.html", it appears that there is a bug, where some > > GNOME Core Applications are actually packaged in guix but have not been > > included in guix's "gnome" package. > > >
> Thank you for doing something about this! No problem :) > > > > found out that the following gnome core application packages are indeed > > packaged in guix, but have not been included in guix's gnome package. > > > > gnome-calendar > > gnome-clocks > > gnome-common > > gnome-desktop > > gnome-common and gnome-desktop are libraries, not core applications. Agreed. Are they still relevant to be included? > > > gnome-dictionary > > gnome-doc-utils > > gnome-doc-utils is not a core application. Agreed. > > > gnome-icon-theme > > gnome-klotski > > gnome-maps > > gnome-mime-data > > gnome-mines > > gnome-mpv > > gnome-mpv is not core. Agreed. > > > gnome-planner > > gnome-screenshot > > gnome-shell-extensions > > gnome-sudoku > > gnome-todo > > gnome-tweak-tool > > gnome-vfs > > I don’t quite know, is gnome-vfs the same as gvfs? I don't think so. May be this is the reason why WebDAV files added in gnome-online-accounts not showing up in gnome-files. > > > gnome-video-effects > > > > This appears to be a codec pack or something (?), not an application. Not exactly. Provides apps for web cam etc. > > > > The following gnome core applications are also already packaged in guix > > but requires correct renaming before adding to guix's gnome package? > > > > rhythmbox --> gnome-music > > shotwell --> gnome-photos > > > > Parabola GNU/Linux-libre packaging shows that these are not the same > app and should not be renamed. > > [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss shotwell > community/shotwell 2:0.30.4-1 > A digital photo organizer designed for the GNOME desktop environment > [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-photos > extra/gnome-photos 3.32.0-1 (gnome) > Access, organize, and share your photos on GNOME > [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss rhythmbox > extra/rhythmbox 3.4.3-1 > Music playback and management application > community/ario 1.6-1 > A GTK client for MPD inspired by Rhythmbox but much lighter and faster > [florian@pelzflorian ~]$ pacman -Ss gnome-music > extra/gnome-music 1:3.32.1-1 (gnome) > Music player and management application > > Agreed. So they need to packaged and included separately. > > The following gnome core applications have already been included in > > guix's gnome package but requires correct renaming? > > > > epiphany --> gnome-web > > envice --> gnome-documents > > eog --> gnome-images > > file-roller --> gnome-autoar > > gedit --> gnome-text > > nautilus --> gnome-files > > > > Well, they have two names and others frequently refer to them by > e.g. Epiphany and not GNOME Web, including Epiphany developers. > > Hmm, but the app shows up as Web in GNOME. > Of course, there are more non-packaged applications. > > I also remember > https://blogs.gnome.org/mcatanzaro/2016/09/21/gnome-3-22-core-apps/ > who says, for example, that gnome-tweaks is *not* core. > What?? How else to enable/disable plugins/extensions in GNOME? > > I really hope if the above modifications are made, it will fulfill the > > actual description of guix's gnome package (http://guix.gnu.org/package > > s/gnome-3.28.2/). ☺ > > > > Yes, I agree, that should be the goal. > > Regards, > Florian
