Hello, Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: > >> Mark H Weaver <[email protected]> skribis: >> >>> You can reproduce them with the following command from a git checkout at >>> commit 9e6256ba0f32ab12d61c914a3fed879dac881762, which is the tip of the >>> 'wip-binaries' branch, based on recent 'master': >>> >>> ./pre-inst-env guix build --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs >>> >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ git describe >>> v1.0.1-2479-g9e6256ba0f >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ ./pre-inst-env guix build >>> --system=i686-linux bootstrap-tarballs >>> /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >>> mhw@jojen ~/guix-wip-binaries$ cd >>> /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0 >>> mhw@jojen /gnu/store/rdwyr8mh7dvhfkb5g4cws6q40hp23rbi-bootstrap-tarballs-0$ >>> sha256sum * >>> 3e50c070a100b6bcf84c4bf5c868f9cd0a9fd1570f5d82fbfb78f8411959091b >>> guile-static-stripped-2.2.4-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> 1acd8f83e27d2fac311a5ca78e9bf11a9a1638b82469870d5c854c4e7afaa26a >>> linux-libre-headers-stripped-4.14.67-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> 021543d9bb6af55f39e68d69692e3cb74646ced2cad0bb9ac0047ef81e9d7330 >>> mescc-tools-static-stripped-0.5.2-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> fb32090071b39fc804fb9a7fba96f0bc5eb844a0efd268fb24c42e6bfa959de0 >>> mes-minimal-stripped-0.19-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> c80cdd17b0a24eebdd75570ff72c4ec06e129bd702ac008186b57f6301c448e7 >>> static-binaries-0-i686-linux.tar.xz >>> >>> Do you get the same results? >> >> I built it on bayfront and got the exact same result: > > I'm glad to hear it! Marius and Janneke got these exact results as > well, albeit at a different commit which should be equivalent. Great. >> (I’m actually surprised Guile is 100% reproducible; ISTR there were >> still issues with gensyms in .go files, but maybe I’m wrong.) > > It's apparently not reproducible unless built sequentially. I did some > preliminary investigation, and my guess is that the gensyms produced by > Guile's compiler sometimes depends on whether dependent modules were > previously compiled or not. I see. >> So, green light, right? > > Yes! > >>> To match what 'core-updates-next' expects, it would be good to upload >>> the files above, along with digital signatures, to the following new >>> directory: >>> >>> https://alpha.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815/ >> >> Unless you disagree, I’ll upload these to ftp.gnu.org (not >> alpha.gnu.org, but same directory as you wrote) tomorrow. > > That's fine, although I guess %bootstrap-base-urls will need to be > extended to include the new base URL. Uploaded to <https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/guix/bootstrap/i686-linux/20190815/>. I adjusted ‘%bootstrap-base-urls’ and the branch is now being evaluated for real: https://ci.guix.gnu.org/jobset/core-updates-next Thanks everyone for verifying and “fixing” these bootstrap binaries, and apologies for delaying the process! Ludo’.
