Ludovic Courtès <l...@gnu.org> writes: > Alternately, we could define a new “glib-doc” package that would depend > on the current “glib” package, assuming the build system allows us to > build nothing but documentation.
Some possible drawbacks: - It's not consistent with the other Glib/GNOME libraries like gtk+ or webkitgtk which have a "doc" output. - Previously we had glib:doc and no measure can be taken to let the user know that it's now "glib-doc". So I would got for the glib-minimal route. This bring me to another problem: "glib:doc" was not deprecated, so users who installed "glib:doc" cannot update their manifests / profiles after a guix pull. Can we actually deprecate single outputs? If not, isn't it a bug? -- Pierre Neidhardt https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
