Hi! Mathieu Othacehe <[email protected]> skribis:
>> Yup, turned out patching GCC was too difficult. I'm experimenting a >> filter over inputs passed to set-path-environment-variable in set-paths. > > This is also quite tricky, because the "libc" input passed to set-paths > must not be removed from C_INCLUDE_PATH in (gnu packages commencement) > for mes packages. Yeah, fiddling with ‘set-paths’ sounds like opening a can of worms. > So, maybe the best option is to patch QEMU directly, as proposed in > the attached patch. WDYT? I’m all in favor of that for now. It’s likely that QEMU is the only package having problems, as Marius noted (the GHC error sounds like it could be something different), so I’d say go for the package-specific solution for now. Thanks, Ludo’.
