Hi Ludovic, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes:
> Hi Maxim, > > Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> Hi Maxim, >>> >>> Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> skribis: >>> >>>> Maxim Cournoyer <[email protected]> writes: >>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> writes: >>>>> >>>>> [...] >>>>> >>>>>> Starting download of >>>>>> /gnu/store/124q26gkdyls859sblabz3f60grfvvdl-tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz >>>>>> From >>>>>> https://archive.softwareheritage.org/api/1/content/sha256:2cd47cb3d460b6ff75f4a9940f594317ad456cfbf2bd2c8e5151e16559db6410/raw/... >>>>>> In procedure fport_write: Ne haviĝas plu da spaco sur aparato >>>>>> failed to download >>>>>> "/gnu/store/124q26gkdyls859sblabz3f60grfvvdl-tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz" >>>>>> from "https://www.tcpdump.org/release/tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz"; >>>>>> warning: rewriting hashes in >>>>>> `/gnu/store/mv33j0si1n75q9kdimhvyrjn05pbxz5b-tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz'; >>>>>> cross fingers >>>>>> sha256 hash mismatch for >>>>>> /gnu/store/mv33j0si1n75q9kdimhvyrjn05pbxz5b-tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz: >>>>>> expected hash: 0434vdcnbqaia672rggjzdn4bb8p8dchz559yiszzdk0sjrprm1c >>>>>> actual hash: 0mdqa9w1p6cmli6976v4wi0sw9r4p5prkj7lzfd1877wk11c9c73 >>>>>> hash mismatch for store item >>>>>> '/gnu/store/mv33j0si1n75q9kdimhvyrjn05pbxz5b-tcpdump-4.9.3.tar.gz' >>>>>> >>>>>>> The root cause is that ‘false-if-exception*’ as used in (guix build >>>>>>> download) is too coarse-grain. >>>>>> >>>>>> I came up with a fix in 4a6ec23a9780bd75a7e527bd0dfb1943347869bb. >>>> >>>> I'm re-opening this issue, as it occurred again using Guix >>>> 7ff639510096ff762b9cced5fba6db254a961af9. >>> >>> Yes, that’s because we need to update the ‘guix’ package. Concretely, >>> in this case, the code I modified in invoked via a “builtin:download” >>> derivation, and thus running on the daemon side; that’s why. >>> >>> We can close once ‘guix’ is updated if you want. >> >> Oh! I see. Seems like an nice opportunity for me to learn about doing >> so. I see we have a target for it in our Makefile.am. Should I proceed? > > Sure, you can give it a try. “make update-guix-package && > ./pre-inst-env guix build guix” basically. > > In general we try to do this once in a while, when several daemon-side > changes have accumulated. I see it's been bumped to 1.1.0 three days ago. Closing. Maxim
