Apologies for my faux pas ;-/ This was not a guix bug, and you have rightly ignored my report. (now submitted to bug-guile, with hopes of nz human acks :)
(I guess it will get a new number, so 40744 can be closed?) (BTW, no offense intended in addressing you as "guix/guile bug-squashers" ;-/) On +2020-04-21 15:03:44 +0200, Bengt Richter wrote: > Hello guix/guile bug-squashers, > > The tl;dr is: > (integer-length 0) should agree with: > (string-length (number->string 0 2)) =-> 1 > -- and not: (integer-length 0) =-> 0 -- Regards, Bengt Richter
