Jan Wielkiewicz <[email protected]> writes:
> Dnia 2020-07-29, o godz. 22:17:01 > Ricardo Wurmus <[email protected]> napisał(a): > >> >> “avr-toolchain” is a procedure, not a package. Use >> “avr-toolchain-4.9” or “avr-toolchain-5”. >> > > Success! > > What about the strange message though? > "incorrect package definition" would be better. “Unbound variable: ~S” looks like a format string with a placeholder that didn’t get replaced with an actual value. It would be marginally better if it said “Unbound variable: avr-toolchain”. We should, I think, take advantage of the fact that the type of inputs is known: it can only be an origin or a package value. Perhaps we can catch unbound variables in inputs and print a more valuable error message. -- Ricardo
