Hello, zimoun <[email protected]> skribis:
> On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 at 22:34, Ludovic Courtès <[email protected]> wrote: > >> One thing I don’t quite like about the patch is the fact that ‘guix >> substitutes’ connects to the daemon in ‘content-addressed-item?’. > > What is the status of this patch [1] following the recent discussion about > tar “disarchive” and SWH? > > Related: > - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/issue/39575 > - http://issues.guix.gnu.org/42162 > - https://git.ngyro.com/disarchive/ Thanks for the reminder. I don’t think Timothy’s work changes anything wrt. to this issue: it would still need to be addressed. Ludo’.
