Dear, On Wed, 30 Sep 2020 at 14:42, Julien Lepiller <jul...@lepiller.eu> wrote:
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- >> Binary files >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator.cma >> and >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3-check/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator.cma >> differ Binary files >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator__Extract_obj.cmt >> and >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3-check/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator__Extract_obj.cmt >> differ Binary files >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator__V1.cmti >> and >> /gnu/store/1wwdmzcjhrpal92sz2zwzhyqmbc3w7ri-dune-1.11.3-check/lib/ocaml/site-lib/dune/configurator/configurator__V1.cmti >> differ [...] > The difference seems to be bigger than a simple timestamp, but it's all > on binary files, and diffoscope is not very useful for that. Maybe file > system ordering? I'm investigating. Is it not related to your detailed analysis: <http://issues.guix.gnu.org/43745#51> BTW, the update of “dune“ #43745 seems fixing the issue. All the best, simon
